Topics
Seeking refuge from
heated gusts of wind, we pulled thick curtains over the doors and windows of
the room to create shades, and only then did we find some relief. And in this
dark, shaded room, as blades of the fan started to move, coolness set in and
created a dazed and intoxicated feeling. At the time it was the four of us,
friends, present in the room. One person was reclined against the sofa. The
other person was sitting uptight in a Buddha pose, staring into space, lost in
some thought or the other. The third person was busy reading a book. And the
condition of the fourth person in the room was such that he had only but a
cotton wrap ['lungi'] around his waist. The atmosphere was as if the ambience
of the room had come to halt at a single point. Although the four gentlemen
were seated in their separate ways and were engrossed in their separate
thoughts, they had one thing in common—what was summon between them was that
their eyes were twinkling with reflection. One from among those four initiated
the chain of conversation.
“Friends, what is
the definition of friend, and who is the best of friends?"
The person seated in
the Buddha pose staring into space was startled by this question, and he said:
"A person's best friend is his own heart — the one who comes to understand
his own heart, and sees his own image inside his heart, becomes aware of the
friend. That is, becomes his own friend."
The third person who
had been busy reading, took his eyes off the book and asked, "How is it
possible to become one's own friend?"
The gentleman
sitting on the sofa also joined in the conversation and said, "It is
possible for a person to become his own friend by gaining awareness of his
heart. As long as we consider life to be only a means of fulfilling physical
needs we remain at a distance from our heart and soul. Once when we start to
think above and beyond the physical needs, doors [leading] to spirit and
spiritual realities open upon us."
The topic was so
complex that all four gentlemen present in that cool dark room started
attending to the issue with their intellectual energy. The question that arose
was: 'What is the difference between the heart and the spirit? And in the
absence of a body? how meaningful would remain the needs of the spirit? And in
the absence of a spirit the body has no worth whatsoever. How plausible
is it to say that the
relationship between the heart and the spirit is the true
relationship while the
relationship with the body is mortal and unreal, even though we become aware of
the body first and the spirit afterwards; also, our knowledge of the spirit is
merely academic and not observational, whereas the body holds an academic as
well as an observational presence?'
The person clad in
the lungi brought up something far-fetched. In a loud and echoing voice he
said, "Existence of the body is dependent on the spirit; the spirit is not
dependent upon the, existence of the body. And this is proved by the reality
that in the absence of the spirit, man is nothing but a corpse. As long as
spirit is connected to the body of flesh and blood, the physical body remains
active. This body of flesh and blood is able to see, and hear, and touch, and
speak, and it is able to feel the waves of heat and coolness. But if the spirit
breaks its connection with this body of flesh and blood, the physical body
neither hears, nor speaks, and neither does it feel. In the presence of the
spirit, a person feels even the slightest prick of a needle point upon his
body, and in the absence of the spirit a person would not feel a thing or have
any power to defend even if his body were to be chopped in little pieces with a
large cleaving weapon. This process of life proves that the reality of a person
is his spirit and not his body of flesh and blood. If a person is aware of his
heart and his spirit, he is a friend to himself, whereas if a person considers
his body of flesh and blood to be his all, he is an enemy to himself. The heart
becomes an enemy to the person who has no concept of a spiritual life within
him. If a person wants to employ his heart for a foul job, the heart refuses to
serve him. It traps the person in materialism, confined by time and space. And
if a person seeks from his heart the path to his soul, the heart, like good and
sincere friend, directs him towards the spiritual relationships. And the heart
not only tells him, but shows him, the spirit is pure, while the body is foul.
It is revealed to the person that all the happiness associated with the body is
temporary like the body itself, and since the spirit itself is perpetual joy,
those of spiritual inclination remain happy. The shadows of fear and grief run
away from them. This material world—the world of the bodies of flesh and blood
is a world of dualities: Happy at one moment, and sad the next moment the cause
of our disgrace. In this materialistic world of duality, we will not be able to
understand anything sill we understand the contrast of joy and sadness, honor
and disgrace, coolness and heat. Unless I am aware of what disgrace is, I will
not be able to comprehend the meaning of honor. Unless I have suffered through
severe hardships, I will not be able to understand happiness. To pass through
this contradiction, one must free oneself from the duality of this material
world. When a person passes through the duality of this materialistic world and
becomes a student of self-awareness, he looks upon each object with the same
perspective, whether it is pebbles and stones or whether it is gold. And as
long as a person is unacquainted with the knowledge of self-awareness, his
heart remains restless and anxious. To remove the anxiety and restlessness of
the heart one must adopt a specific way of thinking, and this way of thinking
is the free way of thinking."
The person clad in
the lungi said, 'this free way of thinking is actually the conscious of a
qalander ['spiritual free thinker, untied to conventions']. The qalander
conscious shows us the way to strengthen the ties of friendship with our heart.
And that way is [realization] that [in this world] we have neither enemies nor
friends.
We are our own
enemy, and our own friend. When the qalander conscious comes into action a
person sees the entire universe as a stage. On this stage theft are some who
are fathers, some who are mothers, some are children, some are friends, and
some that are enemies, some sinful, and some who are pure. These, in reality,
are the different personas of those who work on this stage. When one character
from among these, or when all of them, step down from the stage, the magic of
the duality of the world breaks and they all become one.'
KHWAJA SHAMS-UD-DEEN AZEEMI
Science has made immense progress, yet many believe that, even with all of the modern tools at our disposal, human beings function at no more than 10% of their mental capacity. This leads to the question of what exactly it is that comprises the remaining 90%. Yet another question that arises is this: If it has taken man four and a half billion years to be able to apply only 10% of his ability, how long will it take for him to make use of the remaining 90%?