Topics
Animals [dwelling
the land] do not work for a living, neither do birds set up shops, yet nature
provides them with all the resources they require to live.
Whether it is
four-legged animals or whether it is the birds, an analysis of their social and
economic life tells us that they are also made of the interplay of feelings and
emotions. They are also possess the urges of anger, sex, maternal love, and
paternal caring. Birds are also concerned with the future of their offspring.
When the children complete the round of education necessary to live their
lives, the parents hand over their house (nest) to their children and fly away.
The parents then build another home for themselves, collecting each twig and
twine anew.
Whether it is
animals that graze on land, or fierce beasts, or birds, they all possess
intelligence and awareness. Insects know that if they do not prepare ahead for
their necessities, their progeny will be destroyed. There are animals dwelling
on the earth that possess a much keener sense of the future than ordinary man.
Cats and dogs can detect calamities and misfortunes before their onset.
The question arises
as to what the difference is between man and beast? There is no difference
between man and beast. Man is an animal walking on his two legs, like the other
animals walk on their four legs. if observed keenly, man appears inferior of
the reliance which a birds shows towards her Creator Man is deprived of the
contentment and careless abandon exhibited by a tiny ant.
The trait that differentiates
man from beast is his connection with the Creator while remaining in the circle
of thought and awareness. If a person does not have a connection with his
Creator, then he is merely a beast walking on two legs. One animal walks upon
four legs, while the other on two. Animals that fly and animals that swim are
also included among the animals that walk upon four legs since they use wings
as well as feet, and thus their state of flight becomes the same as that of
four-legged animals. Within the many different species of animals, man also is
one such species. But when a person develops a relationship with Allah the
Exalted he leaves the category of animals and becomes a human being. And the
thought and intellect that distinguishes a human being is that he cannot help
but cry out that,
'Our life and our
death is all from Allah,' and what proves this beyond any doubt is that when
God gave us life, He did not ask us our desire or permission regarding it.
There isn't a single individual in the world who was born of his own desire or
who will live forever according to his desire. We are only able to make use of
the resources which have already been created for us. Hadhrat Baba Taj-ud-deen
Nagpur has stated this point thus in his couplet:
Four-legged animals
do not work for wages, nor do
birds conduct
commerce,
So said Daas Maloka,
'it is God who provides a
living for all'
A crowd has gathered
to see the newborn cubs of the lioness at the Karachi Zoo. Small children
wearing bright and colourful clothes are standing in front of the lioness's
cage, delighted at seeing the cubs. The lioness sitting next to her cubs,
filled with maternal love, gazes at the human children in the same caring way
she looks upon her own children. At times she looks disapprovingly at her cubs'
mischief and, with her glances, the tells them to stop. But the cubs cannot be
stopped from engaging in their antics. Their mischievous play and jumping
around is providing human children standing outside the cage with plenty of
amusement. At a distance, the lion is pacing gracefully. He is also feeling
happy watching his cubs but shows restraint and does not let his face betray
any emotions. Nonetheless he, intently, watches over his cubs.
As my wandering
glance set upon the king of the jungle, I could not help but be impressed by
the glow and magic in his eyes. As my eyes met those of the lion, I felt as if
the thought-hearing waves in the lion's brain, through the eyes, were colliding
with his internal eye muscles and then those waves were being transmitted onto
the screen of my own brain, conveying a message.
At first, I was a
little worried at this situation, wary of how a lion could convey a message.
What could this speechless beast say an ashraf-ul-makhlooqat ['best of the
creation'] like me?
As soon as the
thought entered my mind that a lion is a beast, the lion's intoxicated eyes
started to stir up storms, and the transmission became so intense that I was
forced to listen to the lion's conversation. The lion was conversing with me
through the mode of telepathy.
He sarcastically
said:
O human, you call me
a beast. Beastliness is defined by the fact that I hunt animals weaker than
myself and fill my belly. How strange is it then that when a lion consumes meat
he is called a beast; yet man, who for the sake of his enjoyment shoots at the
tiniest little bird and eats meat, is not a beast!
My conscious started
to shake with fear as I heard this from the lion. I really desired to say
something to the lion in justification, but all my knowledge and all my pride
at being ashraf –ul-makhlooqat collapsed instantly. As I was thinking of
attempting to escape from the waves coming out of the lion's eyes, the cub’s
mother, the lioness, set her gaze upon me and said:
O human! What is it
that makes you so proud? Look—look at me! Do not turn your eyes away from me. I
may be a female, but it does not make any difference. We are not overtaken by
sexuality. We do not use it to amuse ourselves; rather we participate in this
act to fulfil our roles in the creative mechanism of the laws of nature.
O person claiming to
be ashralul-makhlooqat, listen! A few days ago, a man from your species visited
here. My husband here has somewhat of a philosophical and logical disposition.
Out of nowhere he got it into his head to start an argument with that human,
and began by saying, 'I am stronger than you.'
The man replied,
"No, I am stronger than you."
When my husband
asked him to present an argument to support his claim, the man took a picture
out of his pocket and showed it. In that picture the man was sitting on top of
a lion.
The lion thought it
over for a little while and then asked the man, "Who has made this
picture?"
The human replied,
"A man has made this picture."
The lion laughed a
mighty laugh that seemed to shake the entire zoo, and then said: "O human,
how ignorant and foolish you are! You could not comprehend a simple thing like
this—had a lion made this picture, the lion would have been on the top and the
man underneath him."
The distraction of
children's play and other noise in the vicinity broke my link with the lioness.
And I returned from the zoo trying not to think anything of the matter, yet
could not help but draw number of different conclusions.
There is only One
being who creates, and it is He who has bestowed upon another being the ability
to create as well, but it is an indisputable fact that this second being is
forced to utilize the same matter and elements in his creation which have been
created by the first, One and unique being.
Man is that
second being who has been given the ability to create. Whenever man creates
something—whenever he brings something into existence—in one way or the other,
it is influenced by what has already been created by Allah. In other words it
is by utilizing Allah's creation that secondary creations are brought into
existence. When two of Allah's pre-existing creations merge together, or are
forced to merge, third creation comes into being. Take water and sweetness for
example, which are two of Allah's creations. When water and sweetness are mixed
and merged, a sweet beverage results as product.
Sometimes patchwork
between two things results in the creation of a third. Patchwork [in the form
of crossbreeding [between animals has resulted in the creation of mules
Patchwork [in the form of grafting] on mango trees results in the many
different varieties of mangoes. Similarly, there is a system of such patchwork
established throughout the world. When looking at this field of patchwork one
observes that this skill is prominently present in God's creation, the human,
and there is present a distinction between man and a tree, or man and an
animal, that man is able to perform this patchwork whereas a tree is not.
People who are
familiar with the principles of spiritual perception know that when the eyes of
the spirit open, distances disappear. A period of hundreds of thousands of
years is compacted to seconds. All the evolutionary stages from the time of
Adam until the scientific age of today pass before the eyes like a motion
picture.
While viewing this
motion picture of human evolution, as the spiritual eye leaves the age of
caves, stones and metal, and scans the present scientific age the spirit is
struck by agitation and distress, having realized that the evolutionary stages
which man has called progress, are actually not progress at all. The object of
this progress is not the welfare of mankind but its destruction. There is no
plausible justification for this fatal and destructive "progress".
Here, amassing vast wealth seems to be the only objective. And when the
spiritual eye settles on the image that man, by creating test-tube babies, is
busy in the patchwork [or grafting] of humans as well, dark looming clouds of
ignorance and injustice seem to permeate the surroundings. The subconscious
speaks out that the thankless human has reduced his status and has placed
himself on the same level as mere trees.
One of the reasons
God created trees is for them to be used as fuel. In other words man, by
degrading his own kind to the level of plants, is forcing the earth to treat
humans as fuel. As Allah the Exalted has bound the earth to obey man, the earth
continuously and consistently has been turning into a volcano [in response to
man's own actions]. Indeed if man falls to change his condition, the earth will
burn down his species to ashes.
“So take a lesson, O
ye who have eyes." (Holy Quran ch59:v2)]
KHWAJA SHAMS-UD-DEEN AZEEMI
Science has made immense progress, yet many believe that, even with all of the modern tools at our disposal, human beings function at no more than 10% of their mental capacity. This leads to the question of what exactly it is that comprises the remaining 90%. Yet another question that arises is this: If it has taken man four and a half billion years to be able to apply only 10% of his ability, how long will it take for him to make use of the remaining 90%?